Tag Archives: Mobile Phones

I am an iPhone owner. This is my confession.

I have become a member of an insignificantly small (at the moment), yet very vocal and very visible sub-group of mobile device users. That’s right, I have an iPhone, and you know what, I’m not too disappointed using it. Some (well, ok, most) of the time. Frankly there are some things that quite frankly rock so much on the iPhone it’s silly. Especially if you get it on a decent data tariff.

Firstly is the fact that I am able to have written all this more than comfortably as I queue at the post office, while simultaneously enjoying my mp3 tunes, all from the one device. Class.

The second thing that I really hadn’t realisd was how good (no. Fantastic) the web browsing is on the iPhone. I did use my n95 for browsing, but the using direct touch input does change the experience entirely. My mobile web usage has certainly increased with the iPhone.

Just about at the counter now…..

Thirdly since owning my iPhone my personal data has never been more ‘in sync’. The docking of the device and syncing of information to my MacBook Pro just works so, so so well. I am by no means an well organised person, but thanks to this device and the way it syncs so painlessly with iTunes, iCal, Address book and Mail is great.

These three thngs are absolutely fabulous. I love them. Thank you Apple.

However. Something I noticed soon after I took ownership of an iPhone was the number of other iPhone owners who would great me thus “So you got an iPhone then, what do you think?”. It was as though they had doubts about there own purchase, like they wondered if they were alone in feeling disapointed with it at times.

Don’t get me wrong, the iPhone really is a ‘pretty thing’ and some of what the iPhone does, make no mistake, it does far better than anything else out there. Then on the other hand, Apple have really screwed the iPhone up. They have missed off some things that any fool could see are now standard issue on even the most basic devices on the market. The conspiratorial side of me would even say that, maybe, the iPhones short comings are missing by design.

Here for me are the things that are unforgivable for their absence from the iPhone.

1. No replaceable battery, in this day an age there are so many reasons this is wrong. There is no more blatant example of planned obsolescence than seen in the iPods and iPhones from Apple. At some point in the future, you are going to have to replace this device, or pay Apple a lot of money to change a battery. Ridiculous. There is part of me that is really disapointed at my self for supporting a company that is so morrally irrisponsible to encourage such a thow-away mentality.

2. No copy and paste functionality really sucks, there appears to be no reason for this not being present. Its a useful feature that has been present and available to even the most basic computing devices for as long as I can remember. Heck even the earliest of calculators had the equivalent of copy and paste in the form of “memory recall” its shocking to think that apple are so sloppy to have over looked such a fundamental feature. Remember form follows function.

3. No forwarding of Contact details. Again something that has been possible on every phone I have owned for the last 8 or 9 years. No sending of business cards, no vCard forwarding support. It bites.

4. No tethering. Apple I hate you for this.

5. The camera is shockingly low spec for a device of this price range. low quality, no video. Once again the only real reason seems to be to form a culture of upgrading the device.

I know none of this is new. The fact is, I knew all about these things, I knew they would suck. I knew I would still rely on my N95. A 2 year old device that I still think is more capable as a modern mobile device than the iPhone 3G, but you know what, I already feel better for having got it off my chest. It may even help me enjoy my iPhone more now that I have ‘put it out there’. My Name is Dave. I am an iPhone owner. Its been 3 minutes since the last time i bitched about my new device…

NEC Demos Adobe Flash Lite Intellectual Property

Following the announcement from Adobe of the open screen project, news comes from the Embedded Systems Expo that NEC is showing what sounds like it might be an alternative to Adobe’s Flash Lite Player.

Its a little hard to make complete sense of the post from EETimes.com. But some interesting quotes from the short, slightly cryptic article:

By using our new IP, one can design a portable device capable of processing Adobe Flash Lite several times faster, when compared with using a processor.

Also in the announcement is a hint of better video quality as well.

After reducing the number of gates required for an IC and further tuning the video quality output by Adobe Flash Lite, NEC will start offering its IP in August this year.

One thing that does seem to be missing is an explanation of which Flash Lite version they are supporting, although the mention of video implies this is based around the FlashLite 3 player.

You can read the full (breif) announcement of NEC’s new Flash Lite IP over at EETimes.com.

One further interesting thing is that I could find no mention of NEC being involved with the Open Screen Project from its press release.

Credit where its due: EETimes.com

BitTube Goes Over the Air

Thats right, its all very last minute but I will be presenting a session at the upcoming Over the Air event in London this week.

My session is scheduled for Friday afternoon.

Flash Video Nokia Masterclass – Dave Williamson (Adobe)Learn how to create live video applications with the most popular online video format on Nokia devices.

Over the Air is all sold out now, but you can find all the information about the event over at the Over the Air Blog

I look forward to catching up with you if you are there.

Adobe Provide FlashLite Side by Side Comparisons

Along with the news of updates for CS3 and Device Central to support FlashLite 3 Authoring from within the CS 3 suite of products. The FlashLite product website has a side by side comparison of various Flash player specifications that are currently being used in Mobiles and other devices.

see the Flash Version Comparison Chart

Some Points of interest for me were the following:

  • The FlashLite 3 player is actually smaller than the FlashLite 2.1 player
  • The minimum memory requirements for the FlashLite 3 player is un-altered
  • The recommended memory is un-altered for for the FlashLite 3 Player
  • There is no improvement in the worst case memory usage of FlashLite 3 content over FlashLite 2.1
  • Added support for meta data in FlashLite 3 Content

Also I see that the FlashLite 3 player has “External API for browser scripting”, assuming there is a mechanism to update the players within device web browsers this may well offer a clean interface for the detection of screen orientation I have been experimenting with lately.

Another interesting point FlashLite 2.1 and FlashLite 3 seem to both offer support for “Complex languages (Thai, Arabic, Hebrew, etc.)”. Yet this is still not supported by the desktop player? Yet.

Bill Perry presentation availible for download, Creating and Selling Your Mobile Flash Content

Bill Perry has posted a very interesting presentation, the subject is Creating and Selling Your Mobile Flash Content. You can down load the presentation from Bills Site.

Creating and Selling Your Mobile Flash Content

I also noticed Bill has a document linked at the very top of his site, under the banner “Addressable devices for developers“.